OUR THOUGHTS ON:

New Accounting Guidance Requiring Consolidation of Leasing Entities

Audit|Automobile

By Trevor Warren

As we move closer to the end of the year and prepare for upcoming financial statement audits and reviews, it is important to remind everyone that the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-07 – Applying Variable Interest Entities Guidance to Common Control Leasing Arrangements in March of this year.

This amendment permits privately owned dealerships and other companies to not apply the consolidation guidance to certain leasing entities that are under common control or ownership. The most common example is when a dealership leases the facilities from a separate real estate entity that has the same ownership or control. Under the current rules this kind of real estate entity would most likely need to be consolidated with the dealership in the financial statements.

Under Accounting Standard 2014-07, management can elect not to consolidate the leasing entity, but would still be required to disclose certain information about the lessor such as the amounts and key terms of liabilities recognized by the lessor (i.e., mortgages, lines of credit, etc). In addition, the lessee would still be required to disclose the related-party activity as previously required.

This rule is being issued in response to feedback from private company stakeholders, who indicated that the benefits of applying the existing consolidation rules do not justify the related costs. Private company stakeholders stated that, generally, a common owner establishes a lessor entity separate from the private company lessee for tax, estate planning, and legal liability purposes – not to structure off-balance-sheet debt arrangements. In addition, most users of the private company lessee entity’s financial statements state that consolidation is not relevant to them because they focus on the cash flows and tangible net worth of the stand-alone private company lessee entity, rather than on the consolidated cash flows and tangible worth of both entities.

If elected, this accounting alternative should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. The alternative will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early application is permitted.

© 2014 Schneider Downs. All rights-reserved. All content on this site is property of Schneider Downs unless otherwise noted and should not be used without written permission.

This advice is not intended or written to be used for, and it cannot be used for, the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties that may be imposed, or for promoting, marketing or recommending to another person, any tax related matter.

 

You’ve heard our thoughts… We’d like to hear yours

The Schneider Downs Our Thoughts On blog exists to create a dialogue on issues that are important to organizations and individuals. While we enjoy sharing our ideas and insights, we’re especially interested in what you may have to say. If you have a question or a comment about this article – or any article from the Our Thoughts On blog – we hope you’ll share it with us. After all, a dialogue is an exchange of ideas, and we’d like to hear from you. Email us at contactSD@schneiderdowns.com.

Material discussed is meant for informational purposes only, and it is not to be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice. Please note that individual situations can vary. Therefore, this information should be relied upon when coordinated with individual professional advice.

© 2018 Schneider Downs. All rights-reserved. All content on this site is property of Schneider Downs unless otherwise noted and should not be used without written permission.

comments