Potential Changes to Single Audits for Higher Education Institutions

In 2016, the Department of Education (DOE) attempted to implement a mandatory annual compliance audit of Student Financial Assistance programs beginning in FY 2017. This would’ve been included in the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) 2017 Compliance Supplement.  The DOE stated:

 “…an institution may meet this annual submission requirement by submitting annual audited financial statements and a compliance audit of the institution that were prepared either in accordance with the OIG [Office of Inspector General] audit guides or in accordance with the Single Audit Act requirements. In either case, the compliance audit must be submitted annually.  Therefore, a submission prepared under the Single Audit Act requirement that does not include a compliance audit does not meet the Higher Education Act audit requirement."

Several higher education associations expressed concerns to the DOE that this proposal conflicts with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and the Uniform Guidance, which were implemented to encourage more effective and efficient audits by focusing resources on higher-risk programs.  These organizations requested that the OMB provide legal analysis of the Higher Education Act and Single Audit Act, and review the DOE’s position to develop clearer audit guidance.

As a result of the concerns, The DOE has stated that the proposed mandatory annual compliance audit of Student Financial Assistance programs will be delayed to fiscal year 2018.  The DOE stated in its original August 2016 announcement that if an institution’s auditor has determined that the institution’s Student Financial Assistance Program Cluster was low-risk, that the institution should contact DOE’s School Participation Division. As a result of this change, this could potentially increase the cost of compliance for all higher education institutions, since auditors would no longer be permitted to include Student Financial Assistance Cluster (or other significant programs administered by the DOE) in the tri-annual rotation if these major programs were deemed to be low-risk. This change in the audit requirement is contrary to much of efforts put forth in overhaul of the compliance supplements with the adoption of Uniform Guidance over the past few years to adopt a more risk-focused audit approach. 

For more information, contact Schneider Downs or visit the Our Thoughts On... blog.

our thoughts on

array(2) { [0]=> string(2) "21" [1]=> string(2) "53" }
Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education
Why Higher Education Institutions Must Comply with GDPR
Audit BY Adam Goode
Is It Time to Overhaul the Income Statement?
The Dichotomy of Cybersecurity in Higher Education
Minimizing Higher Ed Risks - Utilizing Internal Audit and Data Analytics
Enterprise Risk Management in Higher Education, and How Internal Audit Can Help

Register to receive our weekly newsletter with our most recent columns and insights.

Have a question? Ask us!

We’d love to hear from you. Drop us a note, and we’ll respond to you as quickly as possible.

Ask us

contact us

Map of Pittsburgh Office
Pittsburgh

One PPG Place, Suite 1700
Pittsburgh, PA 15222

contactsd@schneiderdowns.com
p:412.261.3644     f:412.261.4876

Map of Columbus Office
Columbus

65 East State Street, Suite 2000
Columbus, OH 43215

contactsd@schneiderdowns.com
p:614.621.4060     f:614.621.4062