Completed Contract Method Permitted for Grading and Soil Compaction

In Technical Advice Memorandum (TAM) 201650014, the IRS has determined that long term contracts requiring grading and soil compaction qualify for the completed contract method of accounting. The completed contract method allows taxpayers to defer revenue and gross profits on long-term contracts until the completion of the contact.

Under IRC §460, taxpayers with long-term construction contracts are generally required to use the percentage-of-completion method of accounting. The percentage-of-completion method recognizes revenues and gross profits as a percentage of the work completed during the year. While this method provides accurate income measurement, it could also lead to paying tax on income that has not yet been received.

An exception to the general rule is the use of the completed contract method for a home construction contract. A contract qualifies as a home construction contract under §460(e)(6)(A) if 80% or more of the total contract costs are attributable to construction activities for buildings containing four or fewer dwelling units and improvements to real property directly related to and located on the side of those units. These contracts required the taxpayer to perform grading and soil compaction of the pad area for the construction of the homes.

The IRS determined that the grading and soil compaction of the pad area are necessary for the foundation of the houses and should be considered as a portion of the dwelling units. In addition, the replacement of a house and its foundation would require destruction of the pad, so the cost of the pad would be included in the cost basis of the house.

For additional information regarding TAM 201650014, or methods of accounting for construction companies, contact us.

You’ve heard our thoughts… We’d like to hear yours

The Schneider Downs Our Thoughts On blog exists to create a dialogue on issues that are important to organizations and individuals. While we enjoy sharing our ideas and insights, we’re especially interested in what you may have to say. If you have a question or a comment about this article – or any article from the Our Thoughts On blog – we hope you’ll share it with us. After all, a dialogue is an exchange of ideas, and we’d like to hear from you. Email us at [email protected].

Material discussed is meant for informational purposes only, and it is not to be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice. Please note that individual situations can vary. Therefore, this information should be relied upon when coordinated with individual professional advice.

© 2024 Schneider Downs. All rights-reserved. All content on this site is property of Schneider Downs unless otherwise noted and should not be used without written permission.

our thoughts on
Defend Your Dollars and Data: How to Avoid IRS Impersonation Scams
IRS Modifies Position on Grantor Trust Tax Reimbursement Clauses
Postcard from the 38th annual AICPA & CIMA Construction and Real Estate Conference
Construction, ESG BY Matt Hartman
ESG in the Construction Industry: Electrification
“Constructing” Your Estate to Meet Your Needs
New Research and Development Capitalization Requirement Shuffles System
Register to receive our weekly newsletter with our most recent columns and insights.
Have a question? Ask us!

We’d love to hear from you. Drop us a note, and we’ll respond to you as quickly as possible.

Ask us
contact us
Pittsburgh

This site uses cookies to ensure that we give you the best user experience. Cookies assist in navigation, analyzing traffic and in our marketing efforts as described in our Privacy Policy.

×