Effective Dividends to Receive a 100% Deduction under New Proposed Treasury Regulations

It should come as no surprise that taxpayers seek to minimize tax liability and maximize tax benefit. One way to achieve that result is for taxpayers to defer income recognition, and thus defer tax liability into the future. Prior to 1962, one popular mechanism of deferral employed by controlled foreign corporations (“CFC”) was to invest earnings in U.S. property, such as corporate stock or real property, instead of distributing a dividend to its U.S. shareholders. This deferral mechanism was highly effective because earnings of CFCs are taxable when repatriated to the United States, which, until 1962, was only done through the distribution of a dividend. The overseas cash was brought back to the U.S. without a tax cost.

However, in 1962, with the purpose of eliminating the above deferral mechanism, Congress added § 956 to the Internal Revenue Code. Section 956 classifies the investment of CFC earnings in certain U.S. property as “substantially equivalent to a dividend.” Congress determined that the investment in U.S. property, in substance, achieves the same result to the U.S. shareholder as a dividend distribution, and should have the same effect on deferral as a dividend distribution. Thus, effective dividend distribution treatment ended this deferral technique.

Fast-forward to the passage of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act (“TCJA”) and the addition of the dividend received deduction for the foreign portion of an actual dividend received (see previous article ). While the TCJA added a significant benefit to corporate shareholders receiving actual dividend distribution in § 245A, the Act did not add an equivalent deduction to the Code for the foreign source component of § 956 payments.

The failure to update § 956 created a new disparity, in direct opposition to the purpose of § 956, which was to create symmetry between the treatment of actual dividends and payments that are “essentially equivalent to a dividend.” Due to this newly created imbalance, on October 31, 2018, the Internal Revenue Service issued a Treasury Regulation to restore symmetry in the treatment of actual and effective dividends received from CFCs.

The proposed regulation allows a U.S. corporate shareholder to take a deduction for the foreign source portion of the § 956 payment that would otherwise be treated as “essentially equivalent to a dividend.” Which, to the satisfaction of the corporate shareholder-taxpayer, means essentially tax-free repatriation of earnings, regardless of which mechanism is used to repatriate those earnings! Additionally, as noted in my previous article, we may see similar guidance issued with regard to all or some categories of Subpart F soon.

You’ve heard our thoughts… We’d like to hear yours

The Schneider Downs Our Thoughts On blog exists to create a dialogue on issues that are important to organizations and individuals. While we enjoy sharing our ideas and insights, we’re especially interested in what you may have to say. If you have a question or a comment about this article – or any article from the Our Thoughts On blog – we hope you’ll share it with us. After all, a dialogue is an exchange of ideas, and we’d like to hear from you. Email us at [email protected].

Material discussed is meant for informational purposes only, and it is not to be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice. Please note that individual situations can vary. Therefore, this information should be relied upon when coordinated with individual professional advice.

© 2023 Schneider Downs. All rights-reserved. All content on this site is property of Schneider Downs unless otherwise noted and should not be used without written permission.

our thoughts on
SECURE 2.0 Act – Section 101. Expanding Automatic Enrollment in Retirement Plans
SECURE 2.0 Act – Section 111. Application for Credit for Small Employer Pension Plan Startup Costs to Employers Which Join an Existing Plan
SECURE 2.0 Act – Section 126. Special Rules for Certain Distributions from Long-term Qualified Tuition Programs to Roth IRAs
SECURE 2.0 Act – Section 102. Modification of Credit for Small Employer Pension Start-Up Costs
SECURE 2.0 Act –Section 317. Retroactive First-year Elective Deferrals for Sole Proprietors
SECURE 2.0 Act – Section 307. One-time Election for Qualified Charitable Distribution to Split-interest Entity; Increase in Qualified Charitable Distribution Limitation
Register to receive our weekly newsletter with our most recent columns and insights.
Have a question? Ask us!

We’d love to hear from you. Drop us a note, and we’ll respond to you as quickly as possible.

Ask us
contact us

This site uses cookies to ensure that we give you the best user experience. Cookies assist in navigation, analyzing traffic and in our marketing efforts as described in our Privacy Policy.