OUR THOUGHTS ON:

Improvements to Employee Benefit Plan Accounting Are Coming

ERISA

By Jenna Zelenski

After years of disclosures for employee benefit plan financial statements continually expanding, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) unanimously agreed to commence activities to improve accounting for employee benefit plans.  At a recent meeting on November 5, 2014, the FASB discussed the unique features of employee benefit plans, the users of employee benefit plan financial statements and the timing of the annual reporting requirements under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).  Users of employee benefit plan financial statements include not only plan sponsors, trustees, and plan participants, but also members of the Department of Labor, Internal Revenue Service, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (for Form 11-K filers).  Further, employee benefit plan financial statements that are filed with Form 5500 are due seven months after year-end and that deadline can be extended an additional two and a half months.  Meanwhile, employee benefit plan financial statements that file with the SEC using the ERISA format are due 180 days after a plan’s year-end, while those filed under the SEC format are due 90 days after year-end.  Clearly, employee benefit plan financial statements are not useful to those attempting to make investment decisions due to the timing of financial statement issuance.

The following three issues have been identified as resulting in significant challenges when applying current accounting guidance and are in need for simplification within the employee benefit plan accounting requirements:

  • Fair value hierarchy – Consider the extent of detail necessary for participant-directed investments and disclosures about appreciation/depreciation.
  • Classes of assets – Consider conflicting disclosure requirements within accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for ways to disaggregate assets.  Under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, assets are classified based upon nature, characteristics and risks, and under plan accounting topics, assets are classified based upon general type.
  • Fully benefit-responsive investment contracts – Consider whether fully benefit-responsive investments should be measured at contract value, which is how most are reported on the Form 5500, or at fair value, which is how they are measured under GAAP.

This agenda item was moved to the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF), and the FASB encouraged the EITF to consider additional projects related to employee benefit plan accounting.  Stay tuned for additional information as these items are discussed and decisions are made.

© 2014 Schneider Downs. All rights-reserved. All content on this site is property of Schneider Downs unless otherwise noted and should not be used without written permission.

This advice is not intended or written to be used for, and it cannot be used for, the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties that may be imposed, or for promoting, marketing or recommending to another person, any tax related matter.

You’ve heard our thoughts… We’d like to hear yours

The Schneider Downs Our Thoughts On blog exists to create a dialogue on issues that are important to organizations and individuals. While we enjoy sharing our ideas and insights, we’re especially interested in what you may have to say. If you have a question or a comment about this article – or any article from the Our Thoughts On blog – we hope you’ll share it with us. After all, a dialogue is an exchange of ideas, and we’d like to hear from you. Email us at contactSD@schneiderdowns.com.

Material discussed is meant for informational purposes only, and it is not to be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice. Please note that individual situations can vary. Therefore, this information should be relied upon when coordinated with individual professional advice.

© 2018 Schneider Downs. All rights-reserved. All content on this site is property of Schneider Downs unless otherwise noted and should not be used without written permission.

comments