The FASB announced at its October 28, 2015 Board meeting that it will be redeliberating the April 2015 proposed Accounting Standards Update, Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 95*) and Health Care Entities (Topic 954): Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities (Proposed ASU).
The FASB received nearly 300 comment letters through the end of the comment period, which ended August 20, 2015. All sectors within the NFP industry were represented by the comment letters, with higher education and health care institutions comprising 13% and 10%, respectively, of the comment letters submitted.
In addition, the staff and certain Board members held 10 workshops to solicit feedback in five cities across the United States and participated in various outreach calls, including two major financial institutions that lend to NFP organizations. Additional, three public roundtables were held.
As we have written in previous articles within this series, the original purpose of the proposed ASU is to improve financial reporting by NFPs for the benefit of users (all users) of their financial statements. Based on the extensive outreach conducted by the FASB, Board members remain committed to this objective.
Substantially all respondents supported the Board’s overall objective, however, questioned some aspects of the proposal that were viewed as unnecessary. It is also clear that various sectors within the NFP industry have mixed opinions as to the usefulness of certain aspects of the proposed ASU, primarily related to the definition of an operating measure and how it is incorporated into the statement of activities, as well as certain proposed disclosures aligned with liquidity and endowment reporting.
Overall, feedback included a desire to differentiate between ‘business-oriented’ NFPs, such as certain health care entities, and ‘nonbusiness oriented’ NFPs.
Based upon the cumulative feedback received thus far, the Board reached a tentative decision to redeliberate the Proposed ASU into two workstreams. The first would reconsider the following issues and is expected to be completed by June 30, 2016.
First Workstream Issues to Reconsider
Net asset classification scheme, including:
Disclosure of board-designated funds
Placed-in-service option for expirations of capital restrictions
Expenses by nature and an analysis of expenses by function and nature
Netting of external and direct internal investment expenses against investment return
Disclosure of netted investment expenses
Enhanced disclosures about cost allocations
Modest improvements to disclosures regarding operating measures for those that use an operating measure, especially about board appropriations, designations and similar transfers.
Improving disclosures of information useful in assessing liquidity, including consideration of alternatives presented through the comment period.
Statement of cash flows and methods to present operating cash flows.
The second stream would involve reconsideration of the other proposed changes that are likely to require more time, including:
Second Workstream Issues to Reconsider
Operating measures, including:
Whether to require intermediate measures
Whether and how to define such measures
Alternative disaggregation approaches suggested by stakeholders
Statement of cash flows, including realignment of certain line items.
The Board will begin deliberations on the first workstream at its December 11, 2015 meeting.
Visit ww.fasb.org for a copy of Proposed ASU, as well as a summary of the comment letters received.
You’ve heard our thoughts… We’d like to hear yours
The Schneider Downs Our Thoughts On blog exists to create a dialogue on issues that are important to organizations and individuals. While we enjoy sharing our ideas and insights, we’re especially interested in what you may have to say. If you have a question or a comment about this article – or any article from the Our Thoughts On blog – we hope you’ll share it with us. After all, a dialogue is an exchange of ideas, and we’d like to hear from you. Email us at [email protected].
Material discussed is meant for informational purposes only, and it is not to be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice. Please note that individual situations can vary. Therefore, this information should be relied upon when coordinated with individual professional advice.