Read more about the current Greenbook proposals. ...
This site uses cookies to ensure that we give you the best user experience. Cookies assist in navigation, analyzing traffic and in our marketing efforts as described in our Privacy Policy.
Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair eliminated the physical presence standard for substantial sales and use tax nexus, states are now free to impose economic nexus standards as long as those standards do not discriminate against, or impose an undue burden on interstate commerce. While the Wayfair case is on remand to the South Dakota Supreme Court, it is expected that the South Dakota law will survive any additional constitutional challenges.
Justice Kennedy, in the Supreme Court’s opinion, identified the following safeguards in the South Dakota law that prevent discrimination and undue burdens on interstate commerce:
Safeguard numbers three through seven are consistent with the standards found within the Streamlined Sales Tax Agreement, of which South Dakota is a full member. There are also 22 other states that are members of the Streamlined Sales Tax Agreement. Currently, there are 13 full member states that have a similar economic nexus threshold of $100,000 in sales and 200 individual transactions on an annual or 12-month basis with no retroactive collection activity. As such, these states are most likely compliant with the safeguards as described in the Wayfair decision and have a good chance of surviving constitutional challenges. Those states are:
There are additional states that are full members of the Streamline Sales Tax Agreement that meet a number of the referenced safeguards but have not established economic thresholds of $100,000 or 200 individual transaction, neither have they yet passed legislation barring retroactive collection of the tax. Such states include: Arkansas, Kansas, Michigan, New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Washington and West Virginia. New Jersey is reported to have passed the required thresholds and no retroactivity collection legislation, but it is still waiting for the Governor’s signature.
There are a number of other states that have enacted economic nexus standards for sales tax purposes but do not have the protections referenced in South Dakota law, including:
States such as Colorado, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and Washington have passed use tax reporting laws. Use tax reporting laws apply to remote sellers exceeding a certain threshold of sales in the state in an annual or 12-month period. The sellers have the option of registering and collecting the state’s sales tax or complying with the state’s various use tax reporting requirements. Use tax reporting requirements are generally obligations imposed on remote sellers to inform their customers of use tax obligations with their purchases and the filing of reports with both their customers and the respective Departments of Revenue or Taxation regarding their sales into the state. The threshold in Colorado for use tax reporting requirements is $100,000 of Colorado sales. The threshold in Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and Washington is $10,000 of sales into the state. Use tax reporting requirements such as the one in Colorado were declared constitutional by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit. The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the case, so the 10th Circuit’s opinion stands.
States with complex sales and use tax laws such as California, New York and Texas would have difficulty complying with the requirements of the Streamlined Sales Tax Agreement but may be able to get around the constitutional requirements as established in Wayfair by enacting onerous use tax reporting requirements like Colorado and Pennsylvania. Many remote sellers may choose to voluntarily register and collect sales tax instead of taking the risk of antagonizing customers by complying with the reporting requirements.
Remote sellers should begin focusing their attention on states with use tax reporting requirements and those states with remote seller’s nexus laws that closely resemble the South Dakota law. Barring any unforeseen circumstances, it appears as though South Dakota’s law may be considered constitutional on remand to the South Dakota Supreme Court. Therefore, many of the Streamlined Sales Tax Agreement full member states that have imposed similar economic nexus thresholds may also be considered to be within the constitutional standards as established in the Wayfair case.
Other states that have similar thresholds but do not have safeguards similar to the Streamlined Sales Tax Agreement are more likely to face constitutional challenges. While the U.S. Supreme Court said that physical presence is no longer required for a substantial nexus, it did not define the bare minimum for substantial nexus. Nor did the Court say it was essential for a nexus law to have all seven standards identified in the Wayfair case as protections against discrimination or undue burdens on interstate commerce.
While the full member Streamlined Sales Tax Agreement states with thresholds and no retroactivity laws similar to South Dakota appear to be constitutional, the economic nexus laws imposed by other states will have to be reviewed on a case-by- case basis.
Remote sellers will have to be aware of rapidly changing nexus standards in all taxing jurisdictions. Remote sellers should consult with their state and local tax professionals to ensure they are registered in all applicable locations.
Read more about the current Greenbook proposals. ...
Learn more about the regional and national supply chain implications of the Baltimore Key Bridge collapse. ...
We’d love to hear from you. Drop us a note, and we’ll respond to you as quickly as possible.
Ask us
[email protected]
p:412.261.3644
f:412.261.4876
[email protected]
p:614.621.4060
f:614.621.4062
[email protected]
p:571.380.9003