How to Determine an Accounting Standards Effective Date for Not-for-Profit Entities

Since the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2013-12, Definition of a Public Business Entity (ASU) 2013-12, Definition of a Public Business Entity (ASU 2013-12), it has been clear that a not-for-profit entity (NFP) is not to be treated the same as a public business entity (PBE). What organizations might not have realized, however, is that further within that standard the FASB specifically states that given the unique nature and characteristics of NFPs and the users of their financial statements, a public or nonpublic distinction should not be made for financial reporting purposes. Instead, considerations would be made on a standard-by-standard basis.

Why is this important? Typically a new standard issued by the FASB has an effective date based on whether an entity is considered a public or nonpublic business entity. NFPs should pay particularly close attention, because a NFP’s classification can change depending on the standard. For example, currently ASU 2016-02, Leases and ASU 2014-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, states that an NFP that has issued, or is a conduit bond obligor for, securities that are traded, listed or quoted on an exchange or an over-the-counter market follow the same effective date as the PBEs per the standard. This effective date is earlier than all other entities. Typically, NFPs that borrow against municipal bonds fall under this classification.

In July 2017, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) issued updated technical questions and answers to help further clarify the process of determining the status of an organization.

Understanding how a standard classifies organizations is imperative in determining when the standard is effective. As the first round of entities are required to adopt the new revenue recognition standard (ASU 2014-09) for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, NFPs should take a closer look at the criteria provided and ensure timely and appropriate adoption. NFPs should also inquire of their accountants, auditors and other professionals for further guidance or clarification. For more information on the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, contact us

You’ve heard our thoughts… We’d like to hear yours

The Schneider Downs Our Thoughts On blog exists to create a dialogue on issues that are important to organizations and individuals. While we enjoy sharing our ideas and insights, we’re especially interested in what you may have to say. If you have a question or a comment about this article – or any article from the Our Thoughts On blog – we hope you’ll share it with us. After all, a dialogue is an exchange of ideas, and we’d like to hear from you. Email us at [email protected].

Material discussed is meant for informational purposes only, and it is not to be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice. Please note that individual situations can vary. Therefore, this information should be relied upon when coordinated with individual professional advice.

© 2024 Schneider Downs. All rights-reserved. All content on this site is property of Schneider Downs unless otherwise noted and should not be used without written permission.

our thoughts on
Audit BY Erin Puko-Wilking
2024 Audit Plan Hot Spots
Update on GLBA for Higher Ed
Cap Table Basics for Startup Companies
Potential Accounting Changes for Environmental Credits
PCAOB’s New Standard Enhances Auditors’ Use of Confirmations
Single Audit Reporting Reminders
Register to receive our weekly newsletter with our most recent columns and insights.
Have a question? Ask us!

We’d love to hear from you. Drop us a note, and we’ll respond to you as quickly as possible.

Ask us
contact us

This site uses cookies to ensure that we give you the best user experience. Cookies assist in navigation, analyzing traffic and in our marketing efforts as described in our Privacy Policy.