On Tuesday, January 24th, Mayor Ed Gainey signed an executive order directing Pittsburgh’s law and finance departments to conduct a full review of all properties owned by tax-exempt organizations, which they anticipate will take years to complete.
These tax-exempt organizations are currently not required to pay real estate taxes on the property they own where they conduct tax-exempt activities. These exempt properties represent nearly a third of all properties in the City of Pittsburgh. Mayor Gainey’s order is focused on ensuring that the business being conducted on these properties complies with the Pennsylvania public charity test, which is what allows them to be tax-exempt. If the business being conducted on a particular property does not meet the requirements, the business at this property cannot be considered a purely public charity, and the City of Pittsburgh will potentially move to restore tax payments. Religious organizations and places of worship will not be subjected to this review.
On March 28th, Mayor Gainey’s office reported that approximately 10% of the properties have been reviewed since the executive order was signed in January. The City began its review by looking at the largest tax-exempt property owners as well as any properties reported to the City by residents. City Solicitor Krysia Kubiak shared that if the properties reviewed to date were removed from the exempt list, this would generate about $3.5 million in tax revenue for the City. The largest group of parcels belongs to the Presbyterian University Hospital System, which is owned by UPMC.
The Pennsylvania public charity test contains five criteria that nonprofit organizations must meet in order to be considered a purely public charity.
These criteria were determined by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in 1985 and include the following:
the organization must advance a charitable purpose
donate a substantial portion of its services
benefit a class of people that are legitimate subjects of charity
relieve the government of some of its burden
and operate without seeking profit.
Ensuring that nonprofit organizations are operating as purely public charities has been an ongoing battle between the City of Pittsburgh and major nonprofit organizations for 20 years. On March 12th, 2022, a bill was introduced to Pittsburgh City Council to determine the amount of real estate and payroll taxes that Pittsburgh nonprofits would have to pay if they were for-profit entities. The City’s goal was to partner with Pittsburgh’s nonprofits on payment-in-lieu of taxes agreements, or PILOT agreements, indicating that if Allegheny County and the City of Pittsburgh secured PILOTs with just the five largest nonprofits, this would generate $5.9 million and $8.6 million in revenues for those governments each year, respectively. Many nonprofits already make PILOT payments, but they are just a fraction of what the property tax for the organization would normally be.
Any challenges made by property owners that arise will be referred to the seven-member Allegheny County Board of Property Assessment Appeals and Review for final determination.
About Schneider Downs Not-for-Profit Services
Our Not-for-Profit industry group is committed to providing exceptional service and expertise to a community of clients who serve our regions tirelessly each day. We provide valuable insight to not-for-profit organizations of all sizes and their boards through our assurance, tax, advisory and technology consulting services and not-for-profit fund accounting software.
You’ve heard our thoughts… We’d like to hear yours
The Schneider Downs Our Thoughts On blog exists to create a dialogue on issues that are important to organizations and individuals. While we enjoy sharing our ideas and insights, we’re especially interested in what you may have to say. If you have a question or a comment about this article – or any article from the Our Thoughts On blog – we hope you’ll share it with us. After all, a dialogue is an exchange of ideas, and we’d like to hear from you. Email us at [email protected].
Material discussed is meant for informational purposes only, and it is not to be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice. Please note that individual situations can vary. Therefore, this information should be relied upon when coordinated with individual professional advice.