Middle States Commission on Higher Education Revised Compliance Verification Requirements - What's New?

In August 2014, we wrote an article regarding the Middle States Commission on Higher Education published guidelines participating in an accreditation-related review (Self-Study or Periodic Review Report (PRR)).  In 2015, the Middle States Commission on Higher Education published revised guidelines for these institutions.  These guidelines require such institutions to complete the Verification of Compliance with Accreditation-Relevant Federal Regulations for review by peer evaluators. The guidelines were published for implementation in 2016 and require institutions to submit a detailed report and related documentation regarding policies, procedures and processes in place.

Middle States Commission on Higher Education Previous Guidelines:

  • Student identity verification in distance and correspondence education
  • Transfer-of-credit policies and articulation agreements
  • Title IV program responsibilities (including Cohort Default Rate)
  • Assignment of credit hours

Middle States Commission on Higher Education's Updated Guidelines Now Include:

  • Institutional records for student complaints
  • Required information for students and the public
  • Standing with state and other accrediting agencies
  • Contractual relationships

If your institution is in the process of preparing the required compliance report and documentation or if you are interested in partnering with a third party to help evaluate your compliance efforts, please contact us. We have assisted other institutions with documenting processes and procedures with respect to the requirements and have provided recommendations with respect to the compliance requirements.

You’ve heard our thoughts… We’d like to hear yours

The Schneider Downs Our Thoughts On blog exists to create a dialogue on issues that are important to organizations and individuals. While we enjoy sharing our ideas and insights, we’re especially interested in what you may have to say. If you have a question or a comment about this article – or any article from the Our Thoughts On blog – we hope you’ll share it with us. After all, a dialogue is an exchange of ideas, and we’d like to hear from you. Email us at [email protected].

Material discussed is meant for informational purposes only, and it is not to be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice. Please note that individual situations can vary. Therefore, this information should be relied upon when coordinated with individual professional advice.

© 2024 Schneider Downs. All rights-reserved. All content on this site is property of Schneider Downs unless otherwise noted and should not be used without written permission.

our thoughts on
8 Key Considerations When Reviewing User Access
Enhancing Focus on Risk Management and Consumer Protection
The Top Risks Internal Audit Leaders Need to Know for 2024
SOC 2 Terminology: Vendor vs Subservice Organization vs Subcontractor vs Third Party vs Nth Party
Preparing for Financial Responsibility Rule Changes
Register to receive our weekly newsletter with our most recent columns and insights.
Have a question? Ask us!

We’d love to hear from you. Drop us a note, and we’ll respond to you as quickly as possible.

Ask us
contact us
Pittsburgh

This site uses cookies to ensure that we give you the best user experience. Cookies assist in navigation, analyzing traffic and in our marketing efforts as described in our Privacy Policy.

×