Reasonable Compensation

Reasonable compensation is a topic of interest to both the Internal Revenue Service and the shareholder-employees of S corporations and C corporations.

A C corporation’s tax liability is less when compensation to the owner-employee(s) is higher and earnings are lower, effectively reducing the potential for dividends and a double level of taxation.  Since S corporations are subject only to a single level of taxation, S corporation owner-employees reduce their tax liabilities when compensation is lower and earnings are higher (thus reducing employment taxes).  Accordingly, the  reasonableness of compensation is of interest to the IRS. 

About five years ago, the IRS created an audit project aimed at attorneys who were owner-employees of S corporations.  The project determined that many attorneys were not receiving what the IRS deemed to be reasonable compensation.  For example, one attorney had a salary of $30,000 and distributions for the year of nearly $400,000.  The IRS reclassified much of the distributions as wages and levied additional payroll taxes, penalties and interest.

The IRS contends that, “Distributions and other payments by an S corporation to a corporate officer must be treated as wages to the extent the amounts are reasonable compensation for services rendered to the corporation.”

Defining Reasonable Compensation

So what is reasonable compensation?  The IRS does not provide a specific definition of reasonable compensation; it is determined on a case-by-case basis.  While the subjective nature of reasonable compensation has resulted in countless battles between the IRS and corporate shareholders, those shareholder-employees who are able to provide support for their salaries are more likely to prevail.  Some factors that the IRS considers when looking at the issue of reasonable compensation for an individual include:

  • Training and experience
  • Duties and responsibilities
  • Time and effort devoted to the business
  • Dividend history and effort devoted to the business
  • Payments to non-shareholder employees
  • Timing and manner of paying bonuses to key personnel
  • What comparable businesses pay for similar services
  • Compensation agreements
  • The use of a formula to determine compensation

Tax courts have also recognized that higher compensation is justified for individuals under the multiple hats theory, which essentially recognizes that certain owner-employees have more than one role in the company and provide a higher value. 

In terms of actual dollar amounts, the IRS and courts have used third-party compensation studies to establish a reasonable compensation level.  One such tool is Economic Research Institute’s (“ERI”) Executive Compensation Assessor, a leading salary survey tool and one that is also used by the IRS itself in determining reasonable salary levels.  Schneider Downs Advisory Services, using this tool, has performed compensation studies for clients for a number of purposes.

Compensation Review

As the saying goes, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.  Consider the following action items:

  1. Discuss reasonable compensations issues with your tax advisor.
  2. Document:  Put it in writing, before it is paid and preferably at the beginning of the year.  (The IRS has argued that bonuses and other compensation paid to shareholder-employees at the end of the year, after profits have been determined, are distributions of earnings designed to avoid taxation.)
  3. Pay for performance:  Tax courts have also ruled favorably with taxpayers whose compensation amounts were set by independent compensation committees (or minority shareholders) and were documented in employment agreements, board minutes and corporate resolutions.
  4. Get a market-based study:  Consider getting a market-based study completed using ERI’s Salary Assessor or other third-party source.

Please contact Joel Rosenthal at 412-697-5387 or Tom Claassen at 412-697-5330 of the Schneider Downs Business Advisory Group to discuss how we can assist you with your advisory needs.

This advice is not intended or written to be used for, and it cannot be used for, the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties that may be imposed, or for promoting, marketing or recommending to another person, any tax related matter.

You’ve heard our thoughts… We’d like to hear yours

The Schneider Downs Our Thoughts On blog exists to create a dialogue on issues that are important to organizations and individuals. While we enjoy sharing our ideas and insights, we’re especially interested in what you may have to say. If you have a question or a comment about this article – or any article from the Our Thoughts On blog – we hope you’ll share it with us. After all, a dialogue is an exchange of ideas, and we’d like to hear from you. Email us at [email protected].

Material discussed is meant for informational purposes only, and it is not to be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice. Please note that individual situations can vary. Therefore, this information should be relied upon when coordinated with individual professional advice.

© 2022 Schneider Downs. All rights-reserved. All content on this site is property of Schneider Downs unless otherwise noted and should not be used without written permission.

our thoughts on
FTX Filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
International Fraud Awareness Week 2022
Perceived Opportunity: The Insider Threat
Fraud at Wells Fargo: The Pressure to Perform
The Rationalization Leg of The Fraud Triangle
Estate and Succession Planning: Eat the Elephant!
Register to receive our weekly newsletter with our most recent columns and insights.
Have a question? Ask us!

We’d love to hear from you. Drop us a note, and we’ll respond to you as quickly as possible.

Ask us
contact us

This site uses cookies to ensure that we give you the best user experience. Cookies assist in navigation, analyzing traffic and in our marketing efforts as described in our Privacy Policy.