GDPR or Naught

Over the past few weeks, there have been multiple major news stories regarding data security, but one that affects over 85 million individuals is Facebook and the massive data scandal with Cambridge Analytica.  Data that was leaked originated from Facebook, but this data was used improperly by third-party external developers.  However, with proper data privacy and data protection regulations/policies, this could have been avoided. 

Is GDPR Compliance Right for You?

GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation), which goes into effect on May 25th, is a landmark piece of legislation that is changing the privacy compliance landscape and causing organizations to rethink how they operationalize privacy.  This new regulation mandates that any organization that processes, store or collects EU citizen data must follow strict guidelines not only to protect this data, but to ensure that the data is used in ways that the data subject has explicitly agreed to.  Not all organizations must comply with GDPR, but that doesn’t mean they should ignore data privacy, protection and retention around the data that they collect and store. 

Organizations from North America are wondering if they need to be compliant with GDPR and what the requirements and risks will be.  While any organization that collects and stores one record of an EU data subject is technically in the GDPR crosshairs, there isn’t a “one-size fits all” approach to compliance. Compliance efforts should be based on the level of risk exposure that your organization is willing to accept. In addition, there are certain baseline practices that the GDPR recommends that can be implemented anywhere. 

There are different levels of risk exposure that can depend on a myriad of factors such as the complexity of your operations, number of EU data subject records, where your customer base resides, etc.  Based on those facts, there may be different compliance priorities and options depending on the level of risk.

The chart below hypothesizes levels of risk and associated attitudes related to GDPR, possible compliance approaches to take and resulting business implications.  If your organization believes the risk is low, this does not mean you can ignore your current data privacy, protection and retention practices; instead, you should reassess your current business practices around risk posture.  Once you have completed this reassessment, you can appropriately invest around these areas to help reduce the risk of potential data breaches and data loss.  

Implementing Best Practices and Reducing Risk

Just because you feel GDPR is not appropriate for your organization, you should still implement best practices around data protection and reduce the risk of data breaches and data loss.  There are a few common ways that data is lost among organizations, but implementing best practices around data privacy, protection and retention can help reduce the risk of losing your data.

Based upon data from Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, the top causes of data loss include: (1) hacking, malware, or malicious code (57%); (2) unintended disclosure (22%); and (3) portal devices and physical loss (17%).  Companies should prioritize and manage such risk to help limit exposure to data loss.

Understanding your current and expected data security posture, your desired risk appetite and the available investment in resources and technologies will help you prioritize and build a reasonable and effective data privacy plan.

You’ve heard our thoughts… We’d like to hear yours

The Schneider Downs Our Thoughts On blog exists to create a dialogue on issues that are important to organizations and individuals. While we enjoy sharing our ideas and insights, we’re especially interested in what you may have to say. If you have a question or a comment about this article – or any article from the Our Thoughts On blog – we hope you’ll share it with us. After all, a dialogue is an exchange of ideas, and we’d like to hear from you. Email us at [email protected].

Material discussed is meant for informational purposes only, and it is not to be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice. Please note that individual situations can vary. Therefore, this information should be relied upon when coordinated with individual professional advice.

© 2024 Schneider Downs. All rights-reserved. All content on this site is property of Schneider Downs unless otherwise noted and should not be used without written permission.

our thoughts on
Enhancing Focus on Risk Management and Consumer Protection
The Top Risks Internal Audit Leaders Need to Know for 2024
SOC 2 Terminology: Vendor vs Subservice Organization vs Subcontractor vs Third Party vs Nth Party
Did Poor Change Management Contribute to the AT&T Wireless and McDonald’s Outages?
Subservice Organizations: Their Role and Impact on Your SOC Report
Register to receive our weekly newsletter with our most recent columns and insights.
Have a question? Ask us!

We’d love to hear from you. Drop us a note, and we’ll respond to you as quickly as possible.

Ask us
contact us
Pittsburgh

This site uses cookies to ensure that we give you the best user experience. Cookies assist in navigation, analyzing traffic and in our marketing efforts as described in our Privacy Policy.

×