Conversion to Accrual Basis Threatens Small Businesses

The House Ways and Means Chairman David Camp (R-MI) on February 26, 2014 released the 979-page “Tax Reform Act of 2014” discussion draft.  Chairman Camp’s draft proposed to lower corporate and individual tax rates, reform U.S. international tax rules, and simplify the tax Code. Chairman Camp said he hopes his draft legislation will lead to the first comprehensive repair of the U.S. tax Code since the Tax Reform Act of 1986. He stated that the draft legislation will, “fix America’s broken tax code by lowering tax rates while making the Code simpler and fairer for families and job creators.” However, the proposed accrual basis mandate for most taxpayers falls short in that respect.

The cash basis method of accounting is widely used by small to medium-size and privately held businesses largely because of its simplicity.  The cash basis method recognizes income when cash is received and expensed when cash is disbursed. Under the accrual basis method, income is recognized when the right to receive the income exists, and expenses are recorded when they are incurred.  The House Ways and Means committee argues that the accrual method provides the most accurate reflection of income. Nonetheless, mandated accounting for revenues and expenses under the accrual method for taxpayers currently using the cash method could create increased compliance costs and slow economic growth.

At this time, the cash method is available to individuals, sole proprietors, partnerships, and S corporations, with certain exceptions. A C corporation, or a partnership with a C corporation as a partner, generally cannot use the cash method unless it is a personal service corporation, is in the business of farming, or has annual gross receipts of $5 million or less. Under the House and Senate draft, the cash method would be generally restricted to individuals and businesses with under $10 million in annual gross receipts, and farming businesses.

Under the proposal, all S corporations, partnerships, and personal service corporations with over $10 million in annual gross receipts could no longer use the cash method. This would force business owners to recognize income and pay taxes on the income before cash receipt. Cash flow management becomes more complex as a result and could create the need for additional outside financing. This could put an undo financial burden on the owners of partnerships and S corporations as a result of the proposed change in accounting method for income tax purposes.

On September 11, 2014, 233 members of the bipartisan group of the House of Representatives signed a letter urging the House leadership to preserve the cash method of accounting for tax purposes rather than force a change to the accrual method for many businesses. “Those who use the cash method of accounting include many of our local job creators and professionals, including accountants, architects, attorneys, dentists, engineers, farmers, physicians and financial service professionals,” the lawmakers explained. “Importantly, the cash method of accounting is the foundation upon which these businesses have built their business models for decades.”

Likewise, the AICPA is urging Chairman Camp and his committee to consider the financial burden the proposal would place on small businesses. Furthermore, a group of 46 U.S. Senators sent a letter to the Senate Finance Committee opposing the reform. The basic theory of taxation is “the ability to pay,” and forcing taxpayers to recognize income before they receive payment violates this basic rule.

If you have any questions on how this proposal may affect your small business, please contact the tax professionals at Schneider Downs.

© 2014 Schneider Downs. All rights-reserved. All content on this site is property of Schneider Downs unless otherwise noted and should not be used without written permission.

This advice is not intended or written to be used for, and it cannot be used for, the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties that may be imposed, or for promoting, marketing or recommending to another person, any tax related matter.

You’ve heard our thoughts… We’d like to hear yours

The Schneider Downs Our Thoughts On blog exists to create a dialogue on issues that are important to organizations and individuals. While we enjoy sharing our ideas and insights, we’re especially interested in what you may have to say. If you have a question or a comment about this article – or any article from the Our Thoughts On blog – we hope you’ll share it with us. After all, a dialogue is an exchange of ideas, and we’d like to hear from you. Email us at

Material discussed is meant for informational purposes only, and it is not to be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice. Please note that individual situations can vary. Therefore, this information should be relied upon when coordinated with individual professional advice.

© 2019 Schneider Downs. All rights-reserved. All content on this site is property of Schneider Downs unless otherwise noted and should not be used without written permission.

our thoughts on

The IRS turns its focus to cryptocurrency
Kress Case Addresses S Corporation vs. C Corporation Issues
Not-for-Profit, Tax BY Preet Mann
Mandatory E-Filing of Nonprofit Tax Returns
Tax Credits for Plug-In Electric Drive Vehicles
2019-2020 Pennsylvania Budget
Due to Feedback, IRS is Brainstorming Other Ways to Calculate the Tax on Parking

Register to receive our weekly newsletter with our most recent columns and insights.

Have a question? Ask us!

We’d love to hear from you. Drop us a note, and we’ll respond to you as quickly as possible.

Ask us

contact us

Map of Pittsburgh Office

One PPG Place, Suite 1700
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
p:412.261.3644     f:412.261.4876

Map of Columbus Office

65 East State Street, Suite 2000
Columbus, OH 43215
p:614.621.4060     f:614.621.4062

Map of Washington Office
Washington, D.C.

1660 International Drive, Suite 600
McLean, VA 22102