Transfer Pricing: A Reporting Requirement for Multinational Corporations

It should come as no surprise that large companies often create affiliate and/or subsidiary companies to carry out various parts of their operations across the globe. These parent-affiliate/subsidiary corporations are considered related parties, and when they engage in transactions between one another, transfer pricing becomes a very important reporting requirement to consider.

The transfer price, by definition, is the price that one related party charges another related party in a particular transaction. For example, foreign Parent Company (“P”) purchases widgets from U.S. Subsidiary Company (“S”) at a standard price determined by P. The price that P pays to S for the widgets is the transfer price.

Intercompany transactions are common in the marketplace today. The purchase price of the widgets is not negotiated by the two related parties in the same way it would be between two unrelated parties. Thus, there exists a risk that the cost that P pays S for widgets will vary substantially from the cost of widgets had P purchased them from an unrelated company.

The IRS is concerned with ensuring that related parties are not using intercompany pricing as a mechanism to shift profits from one company located in a high tax rate jurisdiction to another related company in a lower rate jurisdiction. To accomplish this, the IRS has been granted the authority to require companies to report related-party transactions and show that transaction costs are within an acceptable range of comparable transactions in the market.

Let’s look at our widget example above. The IRS requires P to report transactions between P and S, and show that comparable companies (same size, industry, etc.) would sell widgets to P for roughly the same cost. If the IRS finds that P is significantly underpaying or overpaying for widgets from S, it has the power to adjust transactions to better reflect the income of the related companies.

The Internal Revenue Code and Treasury Regulations have rigid requirements surrounding the annual reporting of transfer pricing. Regulations provide detailed instructions on how to choose comparable parties and how to calculate the appropriate, acceptable price ranges for comparison. Due to the nature of the analysis, every transfer pricing report is unique and must be tailored to the individual reporting party. There are consequences for failing to report or improperly reporting transfer pricing, so it’s important for corporate taxpayers to keep reports current. Most countries have similar rules; recently implemented Country by Country OECD reporting requirements have elevated the importance of contemporaneous documents.

If you have any concerns regarding related-party transactions or transfer pricing, it’s always best to consult your accountant or one of our tax professionals.

You’ve heard our thoughts… We’d like to hear yours

The Schneider Downs Our Thoughts On blog exists to create a dialogue on issues that are important to organizations and individuals. While we enjoy sharing our ideas and insights, we’re especially interested in what you may have to say. If you have a question or a comment about this article – or any article from the Our Thoughts On blog – we hope you’ll share it with us. After all, a dialogue is an exchange of ideas, and we’d like to hear from you. Email us at [email protected].

Material discussed is meant for informational purposes only, and it is not to be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice. Please note that individual situations can vary. Therefore, this information should be relied upon when coordinated with individual professional advice.

© 2023 Schneider Downs. All rights-reserved. All content on this site is property of Schneider Downs unless otherwise noted and should not be used without written permission.

our thoughts on
SECURE 2.0 Act – Section 604. Optional Treatment of Employer Matching or Non-elective Contributions as Roth Contributions.
SECURE 2.0 Act – Section 101. Expanding Automatic Enrollment in Retirement Plans
SECURE 2.0 Act – Section 111. Application for Credit for Small Employer Pension Plan Startup Costs to Employers Which Join an Existing Plan
SECURE 2.0 Act – Section 126. Special Rules for Certain Distributions from Long-term Qualified Tuition Programs to Roth IRAs
SECURE 2.0 Act – Section 102. Modification of Credit for Small Employer Pension Start-Up Costs
SECURE 2.0 Act –Section 317. Retroactive First-year Elective Deferrals for Sole Proprietors
Register to receive our weekly newsletter with our most recent columns and insights.
Have a question? Ask us!

We’d love to hear from you. Drop us a note, and we’ll respond to you as quickly as possible.

Ask us
contact us

This site uses cookies to ensure that we give you the best user experience. Cookies assist in navigation, analyzing traffic and in our marketing efforts as described in our Privacy Policy.