The survey indicated a more widespread use of the optional qualitative impairment analysis introduced in 2011 and often referred to as Step 0. Public company use of Step 0 increased from 29% in the 2013 survey to 43% in the 2014 survey. Private company use of Step 0 increased from 22% to 29% over the same time period.
Moreover, 78% of the companies applying Step 0 to some or all of their reporting units believe that Step 0 reduces costs, as intended.
Other highlights of the survey include:
30% of public company respondents and 15% of private company respondents recognized goodwill impairments during the most recent annual reporting period.
Only 5% of public companies and 8% of private companies anticipated additional goodwill impairments during an upcoming interim or annual test.
52% of public company respondents and 32% of private company respondents use a valuation consultant.
Step 0 use will likely increase further, since according to the survey, for those respondents who have never applied Step 0 to any reporting units, 39% will be considering its use in future periods.
A majority of private company respondents plan to adopt one or more of the Private Company Council’s goodwill accounting alternatives (61%).
Small private companies were far more likely to perform the Step 0 analysis in-house than large public companies (71% vs. 43%).
Small private companies were more than twice as likely to disregard control premiums in their goodwill impairment analysis, compared to large public companies (82% vs. 35%).
In addition to the evaluation of Step 0 usage in the FEI survey, a special feature in the 2014 U.S. Goodwill Impairment Study is a summary of a Duff & Phelps independent study on Step 0. The study evaluated the disclosures of a random selection of 355 U.S. public companies reporting under U.S. GAAP that carry goodwill on their balance sheets. (This sample size was determined in order to achieve statistical significance.) The Duff & Phelps analysis indicates that Step 0 users have increased from 33% in 2012 to 41% in 2013. The study also found that companies with a market-to-book ratio of 2.0 or greater were almost twice as likely to apply Step 0.
Notably, while the Duff & Phelps Step 0 Study was more expansive than the FEI surveys, the conclusions drawn about Step 0 usage from both sources are comparable.
This advice is not intended or written to be used for, and it cannot be used for, the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties that may be imposed, or for promoting, marketing or recommending to another person, any tax related matter.
You’ve heard our thoughts… We’d like to hear yours
The Schneider Downs Our Thoughts On blog exists to create a dialogue on issues that are important to organizations and individuals. While we enjoy sharing our ideas and insights, we’re especially interested in what you may have to say. If you have a question or a comment about this article – or any article from the Our Thoughts On blog – we hope you’ll share it with us. After all, a dialogue is an exchange of ideas, and we’d like to hear from you. Email us at [email protected].
Material discussed is meant for informational purposes only, and it is not to be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice. Please note that individual situations can vary. Therefore, this information should be relied upon when coordinated with individual professional advice.