OUR THOUGHTS ON:

Recession?...No, It May Be Financial Repression That You Are Feeling

Wealth Management

By Patrick Fisher

Many economic policies of the federal government have a fairly obvious effect on the financial well-being of the citizens. Tax rates, commercial regulations and trade policies are fairly transparent, albeit sometimes very complex. The Federal Reserve’s monetary policy, however, can at times have a self-serving purpose that runs counter to the interests of many individual investors and savers. In the early 1970s two Stanford economists referred to this type of monetary policy as “financial repression.”

In a recent white paper, Eaton Vance Investment Managers defined financial repression as the intervention of government in “capital markets in an attempt to improve their own financial position… at the expense of savers’ financial positions.”

Currently, the Fed is keeping short-term interest rates very low, many argue artificially low. The federal funds rate has been in the range of 0.00% to 0.25% (before inflation) for the last three years. Given the increasingly heavy debt burden that the federal government is operating under, it is in the government’s interest to refinance debt, when it matures, at a low interest rate.

The problem for individual investors and savers is that market interest rates tend to be tied, at least somewhat, to the monetary policy of the Fed. Therefore the rates of return on short-term, relatively low risk investments (T-bills, CDs, and low-duration fixed-income funds) are excruciatingly low. In fact, when inflation is factored in, the returns on these investments have tended to be negative over the last few years. For those who are living off of a fixed income, especially, this has been a problem.

One alternative to accepting negative real returns is to invest short-term assets in riskier investments such as stocks and longer-duration bonds. With the elevated volatility of the stock market and the tenuous nature of the market interest rate environment, these options could create irreversible financial damage for those who can least afford it. Such is the predicament that the policy-makers have gotten themselves, and many innocent bystanders, into.

© 2012 Schneider Downs. All rights-reserved. All content on this site is property of Schneider Downs unless otherwise noted and should not be used without written permission.

This advice is not intended or written to be used for, and it cannot be used for, the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties that may be imposed, or for promoting, marketing or recommending to another person, any tax related matter.

You’ve heard our thoughts… We’d like to hear yours

The Schneider Downs Our Thoughts On blog exists to create a dialogue on issues that are important to organizations and individuals. While we enjoy sharing our ideas and insights, we’re especially interested in what you may have to say. If you have a question or a comment about this article – or any article from the Our Thoughts On blog – we hope you’ll share it with us. After all, a dialogue is an exchange of ideas, and we’d like to hear from you. Email us at contactSD@schneiderdowns.com.

Material discussed is meant for informational purposes only, and it is not to be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice. Please note that individual situations can vary. Therefore, this information should be relied upon when coordinated with individual professional advice.

© 2018 Schneider Downs. All rights-reserved. All content on this site is property of Schneider Downs unless otherwise noted and should not be used without written permission.

comments