401(k) Plan Sponsors and Participants: Be Aware of Unethical Requests

In our ongoing effort to keep you apprised of important industry developments, we thought you should be aware that Wells Fargo recordkeeping is presently under investigation by the United States Department of Labor (DOL) for alleged actions surrounding its asset retention practices. While it’s not uncommon for recordkeepers to attempt to retain as many assets as possible as they exit their clients’ retirement plans, in some instances they’ve taken the misstep of soliciting rollovers to more expensive proprietary IRAs prior to a participant experiencing a separation from service through in-service withdrawal at age 59½.

You might recall that a few years ago, Principal came under similar focus for allegedly recommending rollovers to its own IRAs that were said to be more expensive than what participants were paid within their former plans. As a reminder, no service provider should be soliciting rollovers, so this instance involving Wells Fargo bears watching. Unfortunately, because this a regulatory investigation rather than a lawsuit, we don’t yet have a complete picture of the facts and circumstances.

That said, Wells Fargo’s actions are under scrutiny but, as mentioned, these practices are not necessarily unique. Recent articles in the mainstream press named Morgan Stanley as allegedly having similar goals for retaining exiting assets, while Bank of America’s Merrill Lynch was accused of implementing something similar until they changed last year in anticipation of the new DOL Fiduciary Rule, which is now likely disappearing.

You’ve heard our thoughts… We’d like to hear yours

The Schneider Downs Our Thoughts On blog exists to create a dialogue on issues that are important to organizations and individuals. While we enjoy sharing our ideas and insights, we’re especially interested in what you may have to say. If you have a question or a comment about this article – or any article from the Our Thoughts On blog – we hope you’ll share it with us. After all, a dialogue is an exchange of ideas, and we’d like to hear from you. Email us at [email protected].

Material discussed is meant for informational purposes only, and it is not to be construed as investment, tax, or legal advice. Please note that individual situations can vary. Therefore, this information should be relied upon when coordinated with individual professional advice.

© 2023 Schneider Downs. All rights-reserved. All content on this site is property of Schneider Downs unless otherwise noted and should not be used without written permission.

our thoughts on
2024 Cost-of-Living Adjustments for Retirement Plans and IRAs
Incentive Compensation for Construction Industry Employers
How Safe Are Your 401(k) Assets?
SECURE 2.0 Act – Section 334. Long-term Care Contracts Purchased with Retirement Plan Distributions
SECURE 2.0 Act – Section 348.Cash Balance
SECURE 2.0 Act – Section 312. Employer May Rely On Employee Certifying That Deemed Hardship Distribution Conditions Are Met
Register to receive our weekly newsletter with our most recent columns and insights.
Have a question? Ask us!

We’d love to hear from you. Drop us a note, and we’ll respond to you as quickly as possible.

Ask us
contact us

This site uses cookies to ensure that we give you the best user experience. Cookies assist in navigation, analyzing traffic and in our marketing efforts as described in our Privacy Policy.